Actually, only one of today's three birthday boys was an Australian biologist, but all three live on in the names of familiar Australian organisms. They were three very different people indeed, in almost every way. In order of their years of birth, they were:
* Richard Pulteney, 1730,
an English rural botanist and surgeon. He did a seven year apprenticeship to an
apothecary, which permitted him to practise surgery! He wrote articles for The Gentleman’s Magazine, which would sound pretty dubious today but probably wasn’t then, given that his topics included the Linnaean
system of plant classification, fungi and the sleep of plants! He also wrote
botanical and medical papers for the Royal Society. At age 34 he went to
Edinburgh University to become formally qualified in medicine, before continuing to London to
become personal physician to his relative the Earl of Bath. In private practice
he later prospered, and became very wealthy on the death of his father. He
taught himself conchology (the study of shells) and became regarded as an authority. In addition to an
8-volume work on Linnaeus’ work he wrote a history of British botany. He left
his collection of shells, minerals, herbs and books to the Linnean Society.
The great English botanist and botanical patron Sir James Smith commemorated him with a familiar genus of 120 species of Australian peas, usually referred to as 'bush peas' (a singularly unhelpful name!), Pultenea.
|
Pultenea procumbens, Tinderry Nature Reserve. A common local species. |
* Nicolas Baudin, 1754, was a French career naval officer who worked his way up through the ranks, and led exploratory and scientific expeditions to central and South America before being selected by Napoleon in 1830 to lead the third, and grandest, of the French exploratory expeditions to Australia on Le Geographe and Le
Naturaliste. It was superbly
planned, even carrying a large library of the journals of Dampier, Cook,
Phillip, Bligh and La Billardiere. They also carried passports from the
British Government as protection from the Royal Navy; this was standard practice at the time, when science was seen as benefitting all humankind. Sadly the concept withered not long afterwards.
Unfortunately living conditions on board were so bad and, according
to the records (admittedly written by his opponents, who outlived him), Baudin
was so appallingly rude, that more that 60 expeditioners, including virtually
all the scientists and the three official artists, left the ship at the first available
opportunity, in Mauritius.
Baudin reached Cape Leeuwin in May 1801 and, ignoring
instructions, sailed north along the coast to Timor, then on around Australia
to Van Diemen's Land, rather than going straight to the latter. He had little
choice in this though, as problems with the authorities in Mauritius meant that
he was desperately short of supplies. In so doing he missed the chance to
be the first to explore and chart much of the south coast, because in April 1802 he met
Flinders at
Encounter Bay in South Australia, where he learnt that Flinders had just done much of the job in the Investigator. Thus distracted by each other, they all managed not to notice the nearby mouth of the
Murray River, though this was perhaps understandable and it may even have been closed at the time.
|
Encounter Bay, from the Murray Mouth. |
Overall though, Baudin's survey was not
thorough; he also sailed past Port Phillip Bay without noticing it! The management
and supply of the expedition were terrible; many became ill and had to return
home. Baudin himself died in Mauritius on the way home, but the survivors
delivered 100,000 animal specimens of 2,500 species (nearly all of them new to
science) in 80 crates, and a mountain of botanical material.
Thirty years later Edward Lear (of Owl and the Pussycat fame) named an impressive Western Australian black-cockatoo Calyptorhynchus baudinii (Long-billed, or Baudin's, Black-Cockatoo) after him in a book of paintings. However I just discovered, to my chagrin, that I don't have the photo of this species that I thought I had, so you'll have to make do with one of the very similar Short-billed (Carnaby's) Black-Cockatoo C. latirostris; they are essentially identical apart from the beak. Sorry about that!
* Gerard Krefft 1830, was curator of the Australian Museum in Sydney in the 1860s. Though largely
self-taught, he was probably the leading Australian vertebrate zoologist of his day. More
importantly, he led the resistance of Australian science to the assumption that
only European
scientists were competent to study Australian biology. Born in Germany, he
lived as a teenager in New York, making money selling his copies of Audubon
paintings. He came to Australia
in 1852 to work on the Victorian
gold fields, joined the Blandowski expedition to the Murray Darling junction (which provided the only record of several mammal species in New South Wales, before pastoralism eliminated them) and
was then employed to catalogue the expedition's collections. The museum
trustees, a very powerful cross-section of the establishment, resented the fact
that the Governor made the appointment (though it was a government
establishment, paid for by government money). I suspect that his somewhat direct
and even abrasive manner contributed to the problem. Nonetheless he became
curator in 1864, and seems to have been a very good one. He was a champion of
using museum specimens for public education – this was revolutionary for the
time.
He had a very broad knowledge of zoology and geology,
specialising in snakes. He wrote the book Snakes of Australia, and one on
Australian mammals. He built up the museum collection and made an international
reputation as a scientist, corresponding with Charles Darwin, as well as
Richard Owen, the doyen of English anatomists, and leading US and German
scientists. Significantly he became the first Australian zoologist to champion Darwin’s new
theories of evolution. He was a Fellow of the Linnean Society of London and a
Knight of the Crown of Italy. He reworked the Wellington Caves fossil sites,
and it was over the interpretation of one of these fossils that he dared to
clash famously and openly with Richard Owen, the world authority and a
conservative creationist. This made him something of a hero with younger
Australian scientists of that and subsequent generations.
More ominously for him, he also clashed with the
powerful trustees, accusing some of them (with justification it seems) of
feathering their private collections at the museum’s expense. In retaliation
they set up an enquiry into charges ranging from drunkenness to disobeying the
trustees’ orders. He, perhaps reasonably, refused to defend himself until he’d
seen the charges and evidence – this was refused until they had found him guilty
and dismissed him! He refused to leave his quarters until they hired a couple
of prize-fighters to break down his door and evict him. The courts later agreed
with him that the trustees had no such power, but the parliament then dismissed
him instead, withholding salaries owed until he agreed to relinquish his
rights. Perhaps this wasn’t too surprising, given that the Treasurer,
Attorney-General and Chief Justice were all trustees! He was demoralised and
ruined, and much important research was lost and never published. He died
bankrupt in 1881. This remains, in my mind, one of the most shameful episodes of Australian science history.
His legacy is the name Lasiorhinus krefftii, the Northern Hairy-nosed Wombat; a tough battler like Krefft, but also sadly threatened with extinction. Only a little over 100 of them survive in just 300 hectares of Epping Forest National Park in east central Queensland, where they are regarded as Critically Endangered, though once they extended all the way south to northern Victoria. I don't suppose I'll ever see one, and this statue is probably as close as I'll come.
|
Lasiorhinus kreftii, Clermont, Queensland |
It's been a long post today - if you're still reading, thank you!