About Me

My photo

I've been a Canberran since moving here from Adelaide on the first day of 1980. I now live in suburban Duffy with my partner Louise Maher, ABC 666 radio and on-line journalist. Among my early memories is following Sleepy Lizards (Shinglebacks) around the paddocks north of Adelaide, guarded by the faithful bull terrier. I have always been passionate about the natural world, trying to understand how it works, how the nature of Australia came to be, and sharing those understandings. My especial passions are birds, orchids and mammals. For much of my life I have been a full-time naturalist, running bush tours, writing books etc, doing consultancies, presenting a regular radio slot on local ABC, chairing a government environment advisory committee and running adult education classes. Recently I have eased back somewhat, but am still writing, teaching, doing some radio work and running overseas tours - as part of my fascination with our Gondwanan origins I've been running tours to South America for the past decade. I was awarded the Australian Plants Society Award in 2001 and the Australian Natural History Medallion in 2006, both for services to education and conservation.

Wednesday, 25 January 2017

Nature in a Warming World

Last week there was great excitement in our part of the world when a pair of Tawny Grassbirds Megalurus timoriensis turned up at Jerrabomberra Wetlands, our prime suburban wetland in a city which is now very well-provided with such habitats.
Tawny Grassbird, Jerrabomberra Wetlands, Canberra; a newcomer moving south.
This is a notable southern and inland extension of their range from that in the field guides, which is normally regarded as coming to just south of Sydney, some 200km from here and on the coast. Individuals of any species can pop up out of range, especially following unusual weather conditions, but I’m not sure that this is the case here. In the last couple of years (but never before that) there have been at least three reports from Melbourne, on the south coast of Victoria some 600km further south again from here; I would expect that this species, if it were expanding its range, would be more likely to follow the coast rather than move inland. Moreover it is unlikely that they only selected Melbourne and Canberra over all the possible non-urban sites in areas between – it is simply that these are places with lots of bird watchers and I am sure that the bird could, and will, be found in many other places where they used not to be. The Tawny Grassbird is a skulker in dense undergrowth, and I expect (with no expertise) that outside of breeding season it is fairly quiet.

No, I am surmising that this is a response to climate change, pushing or encouraging warmer climate birds further south (as is happening in reverse in the Northern Hemisphere). 

Less than 20 years ago the Pacific Koel Eudynamys orientalis, a big dimorphic parasitic cuckoo which overwinters in Indonesia and New Guinea and breeds in northern and eastern Australia, was a very rare phenomenon indeed in Canberra, though the odd one would occasionally overshoot and lob up here for a while. Within the space of a few years it became a more and more common occurrence, until now it is a part of our urban soundscape (one is calling outside as I write). People have almost even given up writing to the paper to complain about its 24 hour a day strident serenade! They now breed here annually. There is no plausible explanation for this other than climate change. 
Pacific Koel; male (above) and female (below).


Another large cuckoo, the Channel-billed Cuckoo Scythrops novaehollandiae, has a very similar distribution and annual movements. It is still rare in the ACT (ie I’ve never seen one here yet! though a couple of weeks ago I heard one fly raucously by outside) but it too is getting commoner each year, and I judge that they will also be breeding here in years to come. 
Channel-billed Cuckoo, Karumba, north Queensland.
White-headed Pigeons Columba leucomela have steadily extended their range south from the mid-south coast of New South Wales well into Victoria in the past decade or so, though there is no doubt that part of their enablement has been the spread of exotic food trees like Camphor Laurel Cinnamomum camphora and Privet Ligustrum spp. However, the Camphor Laurel in particular is probably also being assisted to move south by the warming – nature is infinitely subtle.
White-headed Pigeon, Nowra, New South Wales south coast.
As we well know however birds are not the only organisms known to be moving in response to a warming world. A wide-ranging CSIRO study in 2010, utilising a broad array of published and unpublished data, showed that at least 45 species of south-east Australian marine fish have exhibited “major distributional shifts” which were almost certainly climate-related. Warmer water fish from both further north and west have moved into formerly cooler Tasmanian waters, inevitably displacing local species. 

Nor is it even just animals. In a remarkable study begun in 2003 in the Manu Biosphere Reserve in the Peruvian Andes east of Cusco US ecologists Miles Silman and Ken Freeley banded and measured 14,000 trees of 1,000 species in 14 plots covering 2,400 metres of altitude. After repeat measurements they discovered that an astonishing 85% of tree genera were moving upslope in response to warming at a rate of 2.5 to 3.5 metres per year. Perhaps the most pertinent aspect of this however is that the authors estimate that this rate would need to double for the trees to keep pace with the observed warming. (The link above will take you only to an abstract unless you're a subscriber; see here for an overview.)

Cloud forest, Manu Biosphere Reserve, in the area that Silman and Freeley are monitoring.
Studies of 175 plant species in six French mountain ranges similarly showed that 118 of them – nearly 70% – had moved at least 18.5 metres (ie 60 feet) up the slope per decade over the twentieth century.

And here of course is the rub; once the Tasmanian cool water fish reach the southern limits of that island (these are coastal waters fish, they can’t just swim out to sea), and the Manu trees reach the treeless puna, the high cold treeless mountain steppes, there is nowhere further to go. It is the same dilemma facing Polar Bears in the Arctic and Mountain Pygmy-Possums on the top of the south-east Australian Alps.

But this isn’t the only observed forced reactions of species; there are numerous data sets concerning changes in phenology characters – that is cyclical, especially annual, events such as breeding and migration. As far back as 2003 a wide-ranging review in the prestigious journal Nature revealed “significant mean advancement of spring events” by 2.3 days per decade. Five years later the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change’s 2007 report reported that the arrival of spring had been advanced by up to 5.2 days per decade over the past 30 years. Examples cited ranged from first and last appearance of leaves on Gingkos (G. biloba) in Japan, to butterfly emergence in Britain, to bird migration in Australia. 

Gingko leaves, Canberra.
A wide-ranging Australian review, published in 2013, of 89 studies of 347 plant and animal species showed even stronger responses for plants here than in the Northern Hemisphere; the mean rate of advance across all plant responses (leaf set, fruiting, flowering etc) was 11.3 days per decade! Spring migration departure of birds moved forward by 2.2 days per decade (slower than for the Northern Hemisphere, where it was 3.7 days per decade). I mentioned in a recent post how peak flowering of a dominant sub-alpine shrub in the Brindabella Ranges above Canberra has shifted over the 30 years I’ve been taking people up there from about a week into December to late November.
Leafy Bossiaea B. foliosa, Mount Ginini, Namadgi National Park, near Canberra.
Over the past 30 years I have seen the average peak flowering of this pea shrub advance by nearly two weeks.
One of the problems with this is that, naturally enough, each species has a slightly different response to the changes, so that finely-tuned systems are no longer functioning as they evolved to do. Bird chicks are hatching before their key caterpillar food supply does, migratory birds including hummingbirds are arriving before or after the flowers they pollinate are open. In the high alps of south-eastern Australia the already Endangered Mountain Pygmy-Possum Burramys parvus emerges from its hibernation with the snow melt – which is getting earlier each year. Unfortunately the great Bogong Moth migration to the high cool granite crevices of the alps is not getting earlier, which leaves the hungry emerging possums without a key food source.

There are thousands of such phenological studies available, in full or in abstract, or in third-party reports, out there if you’re interested.

In recent times a third general response has been suggested, and demonstrated. While obviously there are always multiple factors acting on the life and evolution of any given organism, we know that in general body size of a given species is likely to be smaller in populations further from the poles – ie in warmer climes. This is known as Bergmann’s Rule and the basis of it is that a smaller object (be it bird, or ball or human baby) has a proportionately greater surface area than a larger one, and thus loses heat faster. We know this for populations of the same species at different latitudes, but what about the same species at the same latitude as climate changes – ie the environment gets steadily warmer? A treasure trove of such data is held in museum specimens throughout the world.

Janet Gardner of the Australian National University, and colleagues, measured 517 museum skins of eight insect-eating birds, collected over 140 years from 1869 to 2001. Six of the species showed a decrease in size since 1950, four of them being statistically significant. The overall impact for those four bird species is that individuals living now at the latitude of Canberra are the size that members of their species were pre-1950 at the latitude of Brisbane (ie 7 degrees of latitude). This I find very striking. Nor is it simply academic - a change in size of even just 4% (as measured in wing lengths by the study) can affect what a bird eats, and thus what it it competing with and must thus further adapt to.
Birds that are getting smaller as temperatures rise.
Brown Treecreeper Climacteris picumnus, Canberra (above);
White-browed Babbler Pomatostomus superciliosus Shark Bay, Western Australia (below).


Nature, as I have observed before, is never as straightforward as our little brains might like. More recently apparently conflicting results from those of Gardner’s team were obtained from south-west Western Australia for wing-lengths of Ringneck Parrots Barnardius zonarius (‘Twenty-eights’, for their call, as the sub-species is known over there), which had increased by 4-5mm over the past 45 years. Tellingly, birds from further north in the state, and from the Western Australian eastern deserts, where temperatures haven’t risen as much, show no such increase. The change is as significant as those of Gardner’s were, but in the opposite direction. There is no reason to suppose however that all species in all situations will respond identically to similar situations, and the author suggests that the parrots might be growing longer wings to assist in heat dispersal, in accord with Allen’s Rule.  
Twenty-eight Parrot, Cervantes, Western Australia.
Longer wings to stay cool?
Only ten years ago such responses to climate change were only guessed at, and there will be more surprises to come. One such, which has no obvious explanation for now, is the case of the Eurasian Scops Owl Otus scops, which comes in two colour forms, dark-reddish and pale-reddish (and intermediates). Italian museum studies showed that the proportion of dark-red forms increased significantly over the last century. Some of that was due to unknown causes (perhaps an increase in Italian forests over that time, where being darker could be advantageous, suggest the authors) but the rest is apparently down to climate change. At this stage the best explanation is that the gene for dark-red is linked to one that confers an advantage in a warmer world, but so far we can only speculate.
Eurasian Scops Owl, pale-reddish and dark-reddish forms.
Illustration taken from Handbook of the Birds of the World, which refers to them as
grey-brown and rufous-brown morphs.
I am no more interested in arguing about the reality of climate change than I am in debating whether gravity exists or if the sky is blue. It does occur to me though that it would be interesting to hear from someone who has chosen to believe in a fabulous world-wide conspiracy of thousands of scientists, to explain how thousands of species of plants and animals were also persuaded to participate in the deception.
BACK ON THURSDAY
(today I posted a day early, as I'll be away tomorrow)


 (And remember that you can get a reminder when the next post appears by putting your email address in the Follow by Email box in the top right of this screen.)

6 comments:

Susan said...

Very interesting and clear overview. Thank you.

Re your last para -- don't go there. Their last line of defence is always 'I don't believe you' and you can't get beyond it.

Another French study has used grape vine leaf bud burst dates in Champagne and compared them to Roe Deer birth dates. Champagne producers are required by law to record leaf bud burst, because it feeds into the calculation for when they are allowed to harvest. The vines are being used by the scientists as a proxy for general leaf bud burst. The dates are important because Roe Deer are browsers and the most nutritious food needs to coincide with the birth of fawns so that the does can produce lots of milk. It no longer does and fawn mortality is going up because the date of bud burst is advancing but the birth dates are not. The scientists predict that Roe Deer will go the way of Giant Elk, and for the same reasons.

Flabmeister said...

Alas I am not able to give you details of the conspiracy. The people that need to know about it, know about it, and the voices that only they can hear have told them not to let the rest of us into the secret.

Your starting point about the Tawny Grassbird emphasises the importance of citizen scientists in recording "firsts" for areas. It isn't just a matter of lifer-bagging (which I think of as the naturalist's equivalent of trainspotting) but an important contribution to monitoring reality.

As well as the birds that have moved South (and subsequently up from the Coast to eg Canberra) there have been examples of birds moving in from the West. You've commented in the past about Galahs arriving in the 1950s and Crested Pigeons have done the same in the 1980s and since. Perhaps Superb Parrots should also be on that list? I'm not sure if that is a response to climate change or something else.

Martin

Ian Fraser said...

Thank you both for those thoughtful comments.
Susan, I hope that people who read the post read your comments too - I didn't know that story and will take note of it for future use.
Like your conspiracy summary Martin! Yes, re second para too. I don't think (but can't be sure of course) that climate change was primarily involved in those birds' movements. I think the Galahs and Cresties expanded with crops and permanent water. The Superbs though moved deeper into suburbia (from far NW Belconnen which is as far as they'd hitherto penetrated) during the last drought; having found reliable good living here I think they were just smart enough to come back next year

aaardvaark said...

I agree a terrific summary of an interesting topic, thanks Ian! We should hope that epigenetics and mitochondrial dna and associated things about which I know nothing allow rapid enough adaptation by sensitive species. Though that's not going to work for slow growing/reproducing species like the trees you mention.

It's angry making stuff to realise that the world's response to climate change could have been decades more advanced and better handled if not for politicians who put their own interests ahead of the interests of the earth -- the entire world. And to realise how many businesses and lobby groups are deliberately cultivating mischief and disinformation to prevent effective action, again in their own selfish short-term interest.

We really (and I'm getting off the topic here, but it does make me angry) need to establish a high-profile archive that records what various decision-makers say and do about climate change, so they can be later held to account. We know that as things go pear-shaped in future, the denialists will gradually change their story (à la Orwell) until in the end they'll be claiming to have "not known", or to have actually saved the world single-handedly, or known all along, or had a great excuse. We shouldn't allow that to happen, and the only means I can think of is to set up that archive -- something to let them know *now* that they will be held responsible for actions they take, thus forcing some better consideration of the facts earlier than otherwise.

And perhaps it's time to insist on some positive discrimination in science as well as gender - at least 20% of politicians to have a science/engineering background by 2020!

Back to birds... I remember thinking at Innamincka on a very hot day that the Brown Treecreepers were a) prevalent, and b) small. I wondered then whether it was just that their plumage was flattened to reduce insulation, or they were actually smaller. Then I remembered another time looking at the Splendid Fairywren drawer at ANWC and being impressed by the range of sizes (and blueness), so decided that the treecreepers were likely actually smaller.

How do we get the same fervour and resources applied to climate change as we now apply to wars against other cultures and religions? Which is more important? The conspiracy you mention in your last para is a beauty, surely the most successful coordination of disparate people and groups (and animals) in the history of humankind! If only we could actually motivate and coordinate so well...

aaardvaark said...

I keep forgetting that I can't edit after posting, and that my name is not included. So aaardvaark is me.

Julian
(in case you couldn't guess by the rant)

Ian Fraser said...

Hi Julian and thanks for an excellent rant! I might have remembered that you're really an Aardvark, but you clarified before i was put to the test. Sorry for the delay in responding - we were away for a long weekend and I've been catching up since. I am particularly struck by your 'high-profile archive' concept - I do like that! Mind you, DT seems incapable of remembering what he said yesterday even when's it's replayed to him... And yes re the quota for pollies! I that others have read this too, but I have no way of checking who looks at the comments. Stay cool!